HC278

HC278 : Degrader (PROTAC) of TEAD1, TEAD3

Structure

Information

  • TEAD1
  • TEAD3
  • Degrader (PROTAC)
  • up to 1 µM
  • Reviewer recommended concentration: up to 50 nM

In Vitro Validations

Uniprot ID: P28347
Target Class: Epigenetic
Target SubClass: Transcription Factor
Potency: Activity
Potency Value: aorund 1 µM
Potency Assay: cell-free AlphaLISA assay between CRBN and TEAD1
PDB ID for probe-target interaction (3D structure): --
Target aliases:
Transcriptional enhancer factor TEF-1, TEF1, TCF13 ...

DOI Reference: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37829

In Cell Validations

In Vivo Data

No in Vivo Validations

Off-Target Selectivity Assesments

Potency assay, off target (cells): Unbiased global proteomic analysis was performed on treated NCI-H226 cells with either DMSO or 500 nM of HC278 for 24 h highlighted significant downregulation of TEAD1 and TEAD3, while TEAD2 was not detectable. Western blotting analysis of the cell lysates from NCI-H226 cells treated with either DMSO or 100 and 500 nM of HC278 for 24 h revealed that TEAD1 and TEAD3 are significantly degraded by 100 nM of HC278. In contrast, TEAD4 was only mildly degraded even at 500 nM dose of HC278. Downregulation of several other proteins including INHBA, ADAMTS1, F3, and ZNF367 was established to be a consequence of inhibition of TEAD transcriptional effect.
I have extra information to add

SERP ratings and comments


SERP Ratings

In Cell Rating

SERP Comments:

Note that optimal concentrations can be dependent on the assayed cell type and should be tested.

(last updated: 21 Oct 2024 )

SERP Ratings

In Cell Rating

SERP Comments:

This compound could be used to probe TEAD1/3 biology in cells but with a lot of care. 1) The concentration should be kept at or below 50 nM; based on the data presented in the 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37829 (Fig. 1E') at 200 nM, levels of TEAD2/4 also begin to go down. The possibility that HC-278 also targets TEAD2/4 is also seen in Fig. 2 data. Using proteasome inhibitor, and TEAD-binding ligand rescues degradation of all TEADs, especially TEAD2. 2) Negative control compounds: based on the data in Fig. 2E, HC278-Neg1 is not a suitable negative control as it, based on visual inspection of the blots, it does cause degradation (compared to DMSO); HC278-Neg2 seems like a better NC compound.

(last updated: 6 Dec 2024 )

SERP Ratings

In Cell Rating

SERP Comments:

HC278 can be used as a dual-selective degrader of TEAD1 & TEAD3. At higher concentrations (>500nM) degradation of TEAD-family members TEAD 2 & 4 can also be seen. HC278-Neg2 is recommended as a suitable negative CRBN control while the POI negative control HC278-Neg1 still shows degradation and target engagement. Stronger degradation of TEAD1 compared to TEAD3 was shown by proteomics experiment in NCI-H226 cells. The user of the probe is advised that selectivity for degradation is shown but no inhibition data of HC278 for all TEAD-family members is given.

(last updated: 20 Feb 2025 )