SERP
Comments:
I am somewhat unconvinced by the presented data on this compound as being wholly on-target and therefore useful as a chemical probe. Specifically:
- biochemical inhibition data are expressed as %age inhibition at 1uM, and values given would suggest biochemical IC50s in the order of 2uM. For credible tool compound activity, a wider range of more potent analogies would be desirable
- these inferred IC50 values are inconsistent with the cell IC50 values obtained, suggesting alternate modes of action
- A detailed covalent binding study is not evident, in terms of other targets which are alkylated. This data is critical to understand possible off-targets which may account for the unanticipated and inconsistent cell activity. Whilst the CETSA studies (and others) do point toward interaction of the compound with the stated target, more potent off-target binding cannot be ruled out and may be more responsible for the observed cellular and in vivo activities, particularly given the structural similarity to other compound classes with well documented polypharmacology.
- PK studies are incomplete - indications of free drug exposure would be helpful to assess dose vs cellular data, to give some confidence in the in vitro-in vivo experimental correlation
Overall, the data are incomplete and do not give a compelling connection from target to observed activity, and as such data generate with these tools may be misleading or consequential, rather than causal. Without further information, I would be hesitant to recommend this derivative as a chemical probe against the suggested target.
(last updated:
11 Oct 2023 )