ACBI2

ACBI2 : Preferential degrader (PROTAC) of SMARCA2, also degrading SMARCA4

Structure

Information

  • SMARCA2
  • SMARCA4
  • Degrader (PROTAC)
  • up to 100 nM

In Vitro Validations

Uniprot ID: P51531
Target Class: Epigenetic
Target SubClass: Bromodomain
Potency: Kd
Potency Value: 208 nM
Potency Assay: SPR
PDB ID for probe-target interaction (3D structure): --
Target aliases:
Probable global transcription activator SNF2L2, SN ...

DOI Reference: 10.1038/s41467-022-33430-6

Uniprot ID: P51531
Target Class: Epigenetic
Target SubClass: Bromodomain
Potency: EC50
Potency Value: 172 ± 109 nM
Potency Assay: TR-FRET using SMARCA2-BD
PDB ID for probe-target interaction (3D structure): --
Target aliases:
Probable global transcription activator SNF2L2, SN ...

DOI Reference: 10.1038/s41467-022-33430-6

Uniprot ID: P51531
Target Class: Epigenetic
Target SubClass: Bromodomain
Potency: EC50
Potency Value: 42 ± 2 nM
Potency Assay: TR-FRET of the ternary complex
PDB ID for probe-target interaction (3D structure): --
Target aliases:
Probable global transcription activator SNF2L2, SN ...

DOI Reference: 10.1038/s41467-022-33430-6

In Cell Validations

In Vivo Data

Off-Target Selectivity Assesments

Potency assay, off target (cells): ACBI2 degrades SMARCA2 with a > 30-fold window over SMARCA4 in RKO cells (SMARCA2 DC50 = 1 nM, SMARCA4 DC50 = 32 nM). Whole cell proteomic analysis demonstrated proteome-wide selectivity for degradation of SMARCA2 in NCI-H1568 cells treated with the compound at 100 nM for 4 h.
I have extra information to add

SERP ratings and comments


SERP Ratings

In Cell Rating
In Model Organisms

SERP Comments:

Note should be taken that the oral dose shown above is for PK studies only. In the manuscript, efficacy and tolerability in a xenograft model at a dose of 80 mg/kg are shown, presumably to achieve more complete degradation of SMARCA2 as shown in a preliminary PD experiment.

(last updated: 10 Dec 2024 )

SERP Ratings

In Cell Rating
In Model Organisms

SERP Comments:

While ACBI2 should be considered a high quality degrader of SMARCA2 in cells, the use of this tool requires caution. The authors show that 2/4 selectivity can vary widely between cell lines and thus time points and concentrations may need to be adjusted to maintain a desirable window. A dose response between 1 and 100 nM seems sensible and SMARCA2/4 levels should be verified for each cell lines tested. While this tool appears suitable for in vivo studies with oral dosing, the level of SMARCA2/4 degradation and its time course is not robustly established and will again likely vary depending on the model. For example in the A549 model a non-complete SMARCA2 degradation was seen in a 48 hour PKPD experiment whereas at 21 days a complete elimination of SMARCA2 was seen; the effect of ACBI2 on SMARCA4 in a 21-day in vivo setting has not been studied. In vivo studies should be in a dose response setting including doses lower than 80 mpk. Data interpretation of ACBI2 experiments should always be accompanied by the determination of SMARCA protein levels.

(last updated: 23 Dec 2024 )